I am getting more and more irritated as the day goes on. I really think I should stick to the cocktails at lunch thing.

I just read this article and it is so ridiculous. I heard over and over in all of my anthropology classes that the only way for evolution to occur is through either mutation or migration. Genes have to mutate and get passed on or new genes have to be introduced into a population through migration from another population. How is it then that someone postualting that human evolution occurred through a gene mutation that they may have identified can turn the anthropological community upside down? Hello, science nerds, we learned this in Anth 101.